Definition: And [the residue] of the families of the sons of Kohath had cities of their coasts out of the tribe of Ephraim.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Chronicles 6:66. It’s a bit complex, but we can understand it in a few key parts: What it's saying: This verse describes the remnants or residues of a specific group of people who were left after a significant event – likely a conflict or disaster. It tells us that a portion of the descendants of Kohath, a family within the tribe of Ephraim, maintained settlements (cities) along the coasts of Israel. Let's unpack it: “And [the residue] of the families…” : This means there were still people who survived the initial conflict or disaster that led to this situation. They weren’t completely wiped out. “…of the sons of Kohath” : This identifies a specific family line – Kohath was a prominent figure in the Ephraim tribe. We're talking about descendants specifically linked to him. "...had cities of their coasts…” : This is the crucial part. “Cities of their coasts” means they established settlements, towns, or areas along the coastlines of Israel. Think of it as fortified areas and trading posts. “…out of the tribe of Ephraim.” : This tells us this group was primarily located in the coastal regions, specifically within the Ephraim tribe. What’s the significance? This verse is significant because it speaks to: Survival and Resilience: It highlights that even after a difficult time, some people managed to maintain a presence and establish communities. Political Control & Defense: Having these coastal settlements suggests a degree of political control or defense in that area. The Ephraim tribe was historically important in Israel, and having strong coastal settlements gave them strategic advantages. In simpler terms: “After the conflict with the Philistines, some descendants of Kohath stayed on the coastlines of Israel, building little towns and keeping a watch for trouble.” --- Do you want me to: Explain this verse in more detail? Give you an example of how this story might have played out historically? Compare it to another Bible passage about settlements or borders?